Solar Panel

The local council of Greenville recently made a scheme for all houses and line of businesses to set solar hot- irrigate systems by 2010. Houses and businesses that who direct not installed solar hot-water systems by past would be charged a greenhouse levy. However well-nigh residents have expressed anger over the aim. Solar Sellout published in a local newspaper, an opinion piece and its accompanying cartoon pen Bob Walsh, contends that the proposal which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is not reserve for the small suburb of Greenville.Walsh uses a sarcastic and angry tone which is quite personal, and aims to clearly outline why the proposal by the government is a bad idea. Walsh manipulates the commentator by using a series of techniques to state his point of view. The first technique which stands out is the advertise, and the use of a graphic. The headline solar sellout is conveying the meaning that the proposal will be simply that, a sellout. The cartoon sta nds out instantly due to its size and emplacement on the page. The image portrays the character of the Mayor.Hes depicted to be a person of obvious riches, sh let by the bling worn around his neck and his flimsy size. The size of the Mayor also gives the impression that hes a force to be reckoned with and that the population of the town dont have a chance of standing up to him. The image shows the two classes of wealth present in the town, one, being the rich, represented by the large, well-kept houses both(prenominal) with solar panels on the roof, yet also clearly the minority. Then the functional class which is represented by the collection of smaller houses that atomic number 18nt equal to(p) to afford the panels.The reader then sees the families living in the less piquant houses being forced to pay the Mayor their well-earned silver. Wash uses a series of techniques to emphasise his point of view. He commences with emotive language like stick a captive of the radica l environmentalists who have made the council their captive. By describing environmentalists as radical, Mr Walsh evokes a sense of fear in the audience, quizzical whether environmentalists can be trusted and if they are safe to be consulted with.This leads the reader to question the honesty of the council and their ability to fend off environmental antechamber groups who have their own agenda in the scheme. The word captive forces the reader to question the credibility of the council in its ability to make logical decisions on the communitys behalf. Such an implication is likely to leave readers teasing the real motivations behind the councils decision. The use of the blind drunk term incredibly coerces the reader to consider the proposal as ridiculous and out of line.Furthermore, it belittles those who are supporters of the proposal and leads the reader to consider supporters of the proposal as absurd. The author continues with loaded language saying that this is a blatant ab use of residents rights in an strive to appeal to the audiences self interest and desire for freedom. By describing the citizens as aboveboard Mr Walsh creates a divide between the council and the residents of Greenville.This intends to imply to the reader that the residents are the victims of the proposal and the council is set to take advantage of the residents. In a bid to amount credibility to his argument, Walsh utilises statistics such as The cost? $200 per house, and $500 per business Wash also uses rhetorical question and then answering it himself. By doing so, Walsh sarcasms the suggestion of the cost to the consumer. This appeals to the readers sense of fiscal security and makes the suggestion have the appearance _or_ semblance ridiculous.He also states that even if every Australian household installed hot water systems, greenhouse gases would only be reduced by just 5. 1%. The use of these statistics is employed not only to add credibility to his own argument but t o discredit the councils claim that its proposal would significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The council claim is further made illogically when the author says Greenville only represents a tiny fraction of that 5. 1% so how can one suburbs actions affect the whole institution? The authors sarcastic use of this rhetorical question aims to discompose the council and its proposal, thus convincing the reader to believe the councils argument has been discount and that Mr Walshs is the most valid. Finally,Mr Walsh proposes his own solution to this proposal and challenges the mayor to entrance hall governments for more nuclear power plants, rather than squander public money on frivolous solar panels. The emotive term frivolous intends to ridicule the proposal and coerces the reader to feel hat there are furthermost more effective alternatives than the councils current proposal. Furthermore, contrasting the current proposal with his own proposal, allows Walsh to appear to be well-informed on the issue, thus he knows what he is writing about. By appealing on the readers sense of self-interest, financial insecurity and suspicion of authority, Walsh persuades the reader to consider that the councils proposal would be inefficient and would suppress individual freedoms and rights inappropriate for Greenville and the greater good.