Tuesday, February 19, 2019
History of the Olympic Games
The un manikind surpassing movement has been shaped by many differentiating factors all(a) oer the years. It has been altered by affectionate, political, and economical factors. More specifically, strugglering times, changes to social structures, and economic activity that varies by country accept been the overall leading factors that have shaped the majestics over the years. The Olympics have shown over the decades that they can be modify by political conflict. How eer, it seems that this is the point of the Olympics, to illustrate national pride, by contest.Bloodshed should non be the way for pride of ones country to be shown, but it should be shown through with(predicate) competition, in the words of the founder of the modern Olympic movement, Pierre de Coubertin(1). The games have been used as a arm for denouncing a countrys sportsmanship, such as in 1956 when Arnold Lunn, a British Olympic team strikeicial accused the Nazis of cheating in the 1936 Olympic games tha t were held in Germany. He went on to allege that the competitors of Germany went onto the course sequence it was closed to athletes.Though the fact that they were trying so hard to suffice, could be an example of the importance placed on the games at the time before war period. This is implied by the statement by Arnold Lunn that victory was the lone(prenominal) thing that mattered to the Nazis, and how they achieved it did non matter as long as they did(3). The use of the Olympics to show off ones country was that demonstrated during the Cold War, when the get together States and the Soviet Union were itching to outdo one another.Bob Matthias gives insight through an reference into the United States yearning to win over Russia. The competitor told of the temperament of winning throughout the team, make up in the athletes that were certain(a) to win for the United States(4). This is a stark contrast to an information work provided by the Soviet Union regarding the olympi cs being held in capital of the Russian Federation that year. It tells of seeking peace with the U. S. , and how the Olympics were a beacon for social progress and democracy(6). This resulted in the U. S.boycotting the Olympics, collect to the obvious bias in the information. Ali Kabir, finally, told of how the rise and fall of his nations hockey team reflects the need of unity in his own country, even going as far as stating that its players are uninformed and have tarnished Pakistans name(10). This further demonstrates how the Olympic Games reflect political events at the time they are being held. Not only do the Olympic games make a habit of displaying the events of the world through its affectionate competitions, but it also lets economic factors manifest in its events.Ryotaro Azuma, mayor of Tokyo, spoke in an inter make in 1972 regarding the 1964 Olympic games held in Japan. He told of how his country finally had a chance to get out of the losing spirit afterward World W ar II and rise as a world trade power. The Olympic Games in this case, were used to boost a countrys economy and wealth as well stimulate back as a leading power(5). A Japanese newsprint editorial in 1988 commented about the use of industrial powers by southeastern Korea in that years Olympic games, or lack thereof.It comments negatively on the fact that southwestward Korea did not have the funding to clique up the games as well as display its industrial and economic power to the world, implying that no matter the medals one, the industrial power by the U. S. , Japan, and other countries will make a lot of profit and relegate a memorable impression on the world while South Korea will not(7). The International Olympic direction provided statistics lending insight into the fees provided into Olympic events, showing an expected trend.In 1980, it is useful to deal that the U. S. and Soviet Union were locked in the Cold War, and as stated previously, the U. S. refused to come to the Olympic Games held in capital of the Russian Federation as well as Russia refusing to attend the one in Los Angeles. The shockingly low fees paid to have viewing and advertising rights to the games held in Moscow reflects the war. Many countries boycotted the Olympics that year, so the severely low amount of fees paid further demonstrates this tense time in during the 20th century.However, the dramatic increase in the fees paid to spread out Atlantas games illustrates the time of peace after the Cold War ended, with over 800 million dollars being presumptuousness to broadcast the games(9). Finally, the Olympic games are altered by the diverse and changing social structures in the world. For instance, in 1908 a photograph of British competitor Sybil Newall barb her bow was found on newspapers across England(2). Whether this photograph was staged to lot newspapers or not, it cannot be denied that this photograph indicates the beginning of womens movement, which was obviously a n key issue during this time in the world.With more leniency being given to women during this time, they were eventually being allowed to compete in the competitive events, though only 2% of the athletes were women. This factor also continues to show during the 1992 games held in Spain, where by then(prenominal) 29% of women were competing. Hassiba Boulmerka was an Algerian competitor during this time and spoke in an interview about her critics, and how being the first Algerian to win an Olympic agnomen did not depend on her gender, but simply on her specialism in her mind and in body.Boulmerka was heavily criticized by Muslim groups in Algeria for wearing shorts as she ran in the events. Despite this, the games illustrated the decreasing requirements for dresses and increase requests for appropriate attire, no matter what gender the competitor identifies as. A facilitative addition to analyzing the Olympic games would be an name reflecting the point of view of a German athlet e during the 1936 games being held in Germany. They could explain why the competitors went onto the courses to practice while they closed, or if they did at all.He or she could balance the point of view by pointing out that they did not cheat, and that they simply were practicing and either did not know the rules or were just doing what they thought would be okay. Another helpful article would be to add on to the statistics provided by the International Olympic Committee by showing how many countries that competed versus the countries that actually paid for broadcasting rights, in particular during the 1980s games.This would show whether there is an actual correlation between the lack of countries participating and the lack of money being put into the broadcasting rights of the games. The Olympic games have been shown to be altered and influenced by the social, economic, and political events happening all around it. It seems to be the central point of tension and friendly competiti on every four years. It was intended to be that way, reflecting the worlds ever changing views on life and each other.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment