.

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

'Imperial Rome and Mauryan/Gupta India Essay\r'

'The most significant difference between royal capital of Italy and Mauryan/Gupta India was the structure of their disposals, yet twain conglomerates were severely influenced by religion and both had similar causes of their eventual(prenominal) downfalls.\r\nImperial capital of Italy and Maurya India were both run as concentrate forms of bureaucracy because it kept their empires strong and to a corkinger extent organized. The Gupta India, however, was decentralized and maintained their strong central government with an emperor and by strictly enforcing the caste system and other Hindu beliefs. Not having a centralized government made it increasingly difficult to agree the empire strong and clear of invasions from neighboring regions. However, capital of Italy, contained an empire and a senate, which allowed lower class people to be apart of and have a say in their written law code.\r\nReligion played a large role in Imperial Rome and Mauryan/Gupta India. The Gupta’s g overnment was organized mostly by the caste system because of their lack of centralization and dependence on religious beliefs to set laws. Confucian and Buddhist ideas also were spreading around India at the time. In Rome, Christianity was taking over. Emperor Constantine created the new capital, Constantinople, and segregated the empire in two halves. He used his great influence to spread the word of Christianity.\r\nImperial Rome and India fell because of disorganization and chaos at heart their empires. They both went through political discontinuity, problems with their taxes, over-expansion, and political corruption. When Constantine divided Rome into two empires, he claimed all of the eastern side, create the western side to lose any forward power and economic prosperity. This led to disorder within all of the Roman Empire. Because India was uncentralized, it was difficult to keep the empire correlated and steady, leading them to subsidize. As both empires go along to expa nd, the military had trouble keeping their borders under control, liberal neighboring countries easy access to attack and conquer.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment