'How far is it acceptable for technology to be used only for financial benefits Essay\r'

'?The inexorable developing of engineering science has indeed become an integral phonation of our lives. Evidently, we often involve engineering al about in every aspect of our lives. As a result, short letter in engineering argona seems very tantalising for closely people as they can potentially generate a lot of profit from this field. Hence, to a greater extent and more than than people lift out to empower in it. However, as people argon getting indulged in profit maximisation, problems concerning ethics and societal welfare start to arise from technology.\r\nSome argue that the usage of technology only for fiscal expediency is acceptable beca spend much(prenominal) advance can be redistributed to the little privileged ones to improve their welfare. However, others claim that it is unacceptable to do so because people, more often than not, may go after such social welfare at the expense of others. I, personally, am more inclined to the latter stand as the sole usage of technology for pecuniary benefit go out deal a fatal mud to the global order.\r\nIt is acceptable to use technology for financial benefit only because it can indirectly add to the societal welfare. This is because some of the profit gained from the selling of such technology is used to help those in need. Hence, silver earned is, in a way, redistributed to the light to boost their welfare. A case in a point is the Gates Foundation in which post-horse Gates, the founder of Microsoft, channels some of his profit from his business organization in the computer field to build this unveiling to empower the needy to lead a intermit life.\r\nhis is obviously unacceptable because every person has the aright to have fair wages and enjoy conducive working environment. Thus, the use of technology only for financial benefit is still unacceptable, regardless of such benefit that may be used to help the concluding and the least, if some groups are being made worse off in the process. Furthermore, focusing only on financial benefit when we harness technology depart make technological development shifts towards the favour of fecund people only.\r\nRich and poor people sure have different kind of needs; bandage the replete aims, mostly, for self-enhancement, the poor are still assay to survive. Hence, since the rich’s demand seems to be more lucrative for many investors because self-enhancement, like plastic surgery, is beyond a shadow of a doubt extornionate and, hence, generates a lot of profit, they will just invest their money for technological development in this area. As a result, more\r\nrudimentary aspects of technology, such as the mass production of provender using food technology, are neglected. The poor will then forgather even to a greater extent than before. another(prenominal) concern from this shift is that the widening of chasm between the rich and the poor will be more pervasive. such(prenominal) result entails even worse implications in our society as social unrest may occur. Hence, habituated the dire consequences of the ill-use of technology, utilisation of it for financial benefit solely is unacceptable.\r\nFinally, the sole use of technology for financial benefit may corrupt our intrinsic determine and virtues as human beings. Paradigm shift on our attitudes towards technology -more accepting and dependent †has made commodification of technology more successful. Thus, more and more people are focusing in this area and if their only goal for the use of technology is on monetary reward, they will do anything to its commercialisation to be even more successful. This includes the addition of elements in the technology itself to allure more people to use it.\r\nUnfortunately, those elements sometimes blemish our determine as responsible humans. A case in a point would be the advent of hazardous video games (gaming technology) that distort the values of people, especially the teenagers and children. If they are exposed by the wrong principles throughout their stages of life, they will, most likely, not grow to people whom the society wants them to be. Hence, since the use of technology only for financial benefit results in such a case, I believe that it is unacceptable.\r\nIn conclusion, it is unacceptable if technology is only used for financial benefit because others aspects concerning global welfare are most likely to be neglected. Therefore, a holistic go about should be adopted in harnessing the technology, so that motley fields in human lives are benefited. Hence, â€Å"technology is a social product” encapsulates the essence in the usage of technology as it should act as a representation of the fundamental needs of our society.\r\n'